ltr: Vol. 44 Issue 1: p. 33
Selected References
Michelle Boule

Abstract

“We have tools that make connecting and working with others easier, cheaper, and faster than ever.” — “Changing the Way We Work,” Library Technology Reports 44:1, Chapter 2

The way of work in the Information Age continues to be commuted by the Internet. The interconnected, collaborative functionality the World Wide Web provides, when implemented and utilized, can help individuals, as well as working groups, achieve greater flexibility and productivity, reports Michelle Boule, the author of the first issue of Library Technology Reports in 2008.

A social sciences librarian and technology trainer, Michelle Boule (Univ. of Houston) examines how technology—which in Boule's report is defined as “any tool that can be used to communicate and collaborate over the Internet”—can and has impacted libraries in her issue “Changing the Way We Work.”

The Future of Library Work

Committees, task forces, and small working groups—all common ways to assign projects, divide work, and produce results in libraries—can benefit from “technology-enhanced work.”

In her issue of Library Technology Reports, Boule reports on technology-enhanced work from several library or library-related projects, including:

  • the open-source software-based integrated library system known as “PINES,” which was developed under the “Evergreen” project—“an ongoing effort to create the best open-source integrated ILS available”—conducted by the Georgia Public Library Service.
  • “LibraryFind,” a federated-search tool built by Oregon State Univ. Libraries (with funding from OSA and Oregon State Library). “OSU wanted to build an open-source tool that worked the way federated search was meant to work,” reports Boule.

In addition, Boule looks at the other technology-enhanced work projects/software: Material Digital Libraries Pathway (MatDL); MyHamilton; and Scriblio.

This issue of Library Technology Reports also delineates technology-enhanced tools, such as Web conferencing, instant messaging, and project-management tools, and it lists specific tools and “widgets” in widespread use (AOL Instant Messager [AIM], Yahoo Messenger, Google Talk, Meebo, Trillian, etc.)

In “Changing the Way We Work,” Boule also provides best practice tips for working in a virtual team environment as well as a list of selected references that provide additional research and analysis about technology-enhanced work in libraries.

About the Author

Michelle Boule's love of information and libraries started at a very young age. After she received a B.A. in English with minors in women's studies and anthropology from Texas A&M in 2001, her love of reading eventually led her to the library profession. Michelle completed her master's in library science at Texas Woman's University. It was in graduate school that a fascination with technology and information-seeking behaviors took hold.

Michelle is a social sciences librarian at the University of Houston. During her day job, she maintains the Ethnic Studies collections, teaches classes, answers questions, does technology training, and works with students and faculty. Though technology is not a formal part of her job, she lives much of her life online. Michelle is very involved with LITA, the Library Information Technology Association; serves on BIGWIG, the IG that maintains LITA Blog (http://litablog.org); was part of the ALA Emerging Leader Program in 2007; and is always looking for ways to do new and innovative things within ALA.

Michelle was a part of planning team of the very successful Five Weeks to a Social Library program (www.sociallibraries.com/course), a free, grassroots course that allows librarians to learn about social software and libraries. She writes and speaks about technology and education in libraries.

Michelle can be found online in various places and maintains her own writing space at A Wandering Eyre (http://wanderingeyre.com). She has been an online gamer and all-around geek librarian for a very long time. Michelle believes that e-learning and Web 2.0 tools are the way of the future and that libraries can survive only by adapting to an online environment.


  • Beise, Catherine M., Fred Niederman, and Herb Mattord. “IT Project Managers' Perceptions and Use of Virtual Team Technologies.” Information Resources Management Journal 17, no. 4 (October 2004): 73–88.
  • Belanger, France, and Mary Beth Watson-Manhiem. “Virtual Teams and Multiple Media: Structuring Media Use to Attain Strategic Goals.” Group Decision and Negotiation 15 (2006): 299–321.
  • Conlin, Michelle Conlin. “Smashing the Clock: No Schedules. No Mandatory Meetings: Inside Best Buy's Radical Reshaping of the Workplace.” Business Week, Dec. 11, 2006, www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/06_50/b4013001.htm (accessed Sept. 10, 2007).
  • DeRosa, Darleen M., Donald A. Hantula, Ned Kock, and John D'Arcy. “Trust and Leadership in Virtual Teamwork: A Media Naturalness Perspective.” Human Resource Management 43, no. 2–3 (Summer/Fall 2004): 219–232.
  • Descanctis, Gerardine, Anne-Laure Fayard, Michael Roach, and Lu Jiang. “Learning in Online Forums.” European Management Journal 21, no. 5 (October 2003):565–577.
  • Godar, Susan H., and Sharmila Pixy Ferris, eds. Virtual and Collaborative Teams: Process, Technologies and Practices. (London: Idea Group Publishing, 2004).
  • Johnson-Eilola, Johndan. Datacloud: Toward a New Theory of Online Work. (Cresskill, New Jersey: Hampton Press, Inc., 2005).
  • Lee-Kelley, Liz. “Locus of Control and Attitudes to Working in Virtual Teams.” International Journal of Project Management 24 (2006): 234–243.
  • Malhorta, Arvind, and Ann Majchrzak. “Virtual Workspace Technologies.” MIT Sloan Management Review 46, no. 2 (Winter 2005): 11–14.
  • Majchrzak, Ann, Arvind Makhorta, Jeffrey Stamps, and Jessica Lipnack. “Can Absence Make a Team Grow Stronger?” Harvard Business Review (May 2004): 131–137.
  • Majchrzak, Ann, Arvind Malhorta, and Richard John. “Perceived Individual Collaboration Know-How Development Through Information Technology-Enabled Contextualization: Evidence from Distributed Teams.” Information Systems Research 16, no. 1 (March 2005): 9–27.
  • Paul, David L. “Collaborative Activities in Virtual Settings: A Knowledge Management Perspective of Telemedicine.” Journal of Management Information Systems 22, no. 4 (Spring 2006): 143–176.
  • Pauleen, Davis J., ed. Virtual Teams: Projects, Protocols and Processes. (London: Idea Group Publishing, 2004).
  • Shreeve, Jimmy Lee. “The End of E-Mail: Discover New Ways to Stay in Touch.” The Independent July 27, 2007. http://news.independent.co.uk/sci_tech/article2800175.ece (accessed June 27, 2007).
  • Sivunen, Anu. “Strengthening Identification with the Team in Virtual Teams: The Leaders' Perspective.” Group Decision and Negotiation 15 (2006): 345–366.
  • Sivunen, Anu, Maarit Valo. “Team Leader: Technology Choice in Virtual Teams.” IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 49, no. 1 (March 2006): 57–68.
  • Yankee Group. “Zen and the Art of Rogue Employee Management.” Report issued July 19, 2007.


Article Categories:
  • Information Science
  • Library Science

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Published by ALA TechSource, an imprint of the American Library Association.
Copyright Statement | ALA Privacy Policy