Chapter 4. Exploring the Development of Deeper Learning Skills: A Case Study Analysis of a Python E-learning Course
Abstract
Chapter 4 of Library Technology Reports (vol. 54, no. 4), “Accessibility, Technology, and Librarianship,” Heather Moorefield Lang, Editor
Chapter 4 is titled “Exploring the Development of Deeper Learning Skills: A Case Study Analysis of a Python E-learning Course,” by George Shaw, Jr. Deeper learning emphasizes that students should engage in critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration, and self-directed learning to master the content. This case study will analyze an online Python development suite offered by the University of Michigan and explore how it uses technology to engage students in deeper learning opportunities. The information gleaned from this case study will provide instruction librarians with additional insight regarding the technology they plan to integrate into their libraries and evaluating that technology so students gain optimal benefit from the use of that technology or library instruction period.
References
“What Is eLearning?” eLearningNC.gov, accessed March 7, 2018, www.elearningnc.gov/about_elearning/what_is_elearning/.
Elizabeth T. Welsh, Connie R. Wanberg, Kenneth G. Brown, and Marcia J. Simmering, “E‐learning: Emerging Uses, Empirical Results and Future Directions,” International Journal of Training and Development 7, no. 4 (2003): 246.
Albert Sangrà, Dimitrios Vlachopoulos, and Nati Cabrera, “Building an Inclusive Definition of E-learning: An Approach to the Conceptual Framework,” International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 13, no. 2 (2012): 145–59.
Sarah Chesemore, Rachel Van Noord, Janet Salm, and Cynthia Saletrik, Trends in E-learning for Library Staff: A Summary of Research Findings (Dublin, OH: OCLC, 2006), https://www.webjunction.org/content/dam/WebJunction/Documents/webJunction/Trends-in-E-Learning-for-Library-Staff.pdf.
John W. Moravec, “The University as a Flag of Convenience,” Education Futures, December 13, 2011, http://www.educationfutures.com/2011/12/13/the-university-as-a-flag-of-convenience/.
“Deeper Learning Approaches,” New Media Consortium, accessed March 7, 2018, https://www.nmc.org/horizon_topic/shift-to-deep-learning-approaches/.
S. Adams Becker, M. Cummins, A. Davis, A. Freeman, C. Hall Giesinger, and V. Ananthanarayanan, NMC Horizon Report: 2017 Higher Education Edition (Austin, TX: New Media Consortium, 2017).
Lauren B. Resnick, Education and Learning to Think (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 1987).
Lauren B. Resnick and D. P. Resnick, “Assessing the Thinking Curriculum: New Tools for Educational Reform,” in Changing Assessments: Alternative Views of Aptitude, Achievement and Instruction, ed. Bernard R. Gifford and Mary Catherine O’Connor (Boston: Kluwer, 1992), 37–75.
Anat Zohar and Yehudit J. Dori, “Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low-Achieving Students: Are They Mutually Exclusive?” Journal of the Learning Sciences 12, no. 2 (2003): 145–81.
“What Is Knowledge Base?” Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 2001, accessed December 1, 2017, https://www.aect.org/standards/knowledgebase.html (page discontinued).
Amy Hall and Sarah Leeman, “Scaling Up: Rebuilding an Instruction Program with Limited Resources” (PowerPoint slides, webinar, Consortium of Academic and Research Libraries in Illinois [CARLI], December 7, 2016), https://www.carli.illinois.edu/products-services/pub-serv/instruction/ScalingUp-HallLeeman.
Nancy H. Dewald, “Transporting Good Library Instruction Practices into the Web Environment: An Analysis of Online Tutorials,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 25, no. 1 (1999): 26–31.
Katie Greer, Amanda Nichols Hess, and Elizabeth W. Kraemer, “The Librarian Leading the Machine: A Reassessment of Library Instruction Methods,” College and Research Libraries 77, no. 3 (2016): 259.
Belinda G. Smith, “E-learning Technologies: A Comparative Study of Adult Learners Enrolled on Blended and Online Campuses Engaging in a Virtual Classroom” (doctoral dissertation, Capella University, 2010), ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.
Marcie Lynne Jacklin and Keely Robinson, “Evolution of Various Library Instruction Strategies: Using Student Feedback to Create and Enhance Online Active Learning Assignments,” Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research 8, no. 1 (2013), www.criticalimprov.com/index.php/perj/issue/view/155.
Robert K. Yin, Applications of Case Study Research, 2nd ed., Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 34 (Los Angeles: Sage, 2002).
Robert K. Yin, Case Study Research Design and Methods, Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 5 (Los Angeles: Sage, 2002).
Brian Burnsed, “Curtailing Dropouts at Online Universities,” US News and World Report, October 20, 2010, https://www.usnews.com/education/online-education/articles/2010/10/20/curtailing-dropouts-at-online-universities.
Michael K. Buckland, “What is a ‘Document’?” Journal of the American Society for Information Science 48, no. 9 (1997): 804.
Frederick G. Conrad, Mick P. Couper, Roger Tourangeau, and Andy Peytchev, “The Impact of Progress Indicators on Task Completion,” Interacting with Computers 22, no. 5 (2010): 417–27.
Donna M. Zucker, “How to Do Case Study Research,” in Teaching Research Methods in the Humanities and Social Sciences, ed. Mark Garner, Claire Wagner, and Barbara Kawulich (Famham, UK: Ashgate, 2009), 171–82, accessed from http://scholarworks.umass.edu/nursing_faculty_pubs/2.
Laura Zaylea, Tamara Sniad, and Kyle Harris, “Our Favorites! Tech Tools for Engagement in and beyond the Classroom” (presentation, Blended Learning in the Liberal Arts Conference, Bryn Mawr College, Bryn Mawr, PA, May 17–28, 2017).
Kris M. Y. Law, Victor C. S. Lee, and Y. T. Yu, “Learning Motivation in E-learning Facilitated Computer Programming Courses,” Computers and Education 55, no. 1 (August 2010): 218–28.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Published by ALA TechSource, an imprint of the American Library Association.
Copyright Statement | ALA Privacy Policy