Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Librarians’ Experiences of Censorship in Carceral Facilities

Jeanie Austin, Chelsea Jordan-Makely, Charissa Brammer, Nili Ness

Abstract


This commentary reviews responses about censorship in a nationwide survey of academic, public, and similar librarians and library staff who provide information to incarcerated people.

For librarians who work with incarcerated people, censorship is often inherent in maintaining any kind of library services, whether the need to censor is communicated directly by carceral staff, invoked in policy, or shaped by a library worker’s interpretation of their role in the institution (Conrad 2017). While at times censorship seems to shape the entire library collection in a carceral facility, librarians have found many ways to build professional rapport with facility staff, subvert demands for censorship, and build robust collections despite prohibitions on certain types of materials (Arford 2016).


Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Arford, T. 2016. “Prisons as Sites of Power/Resistance.” In D. Courpasson and S. Vallas, eds., The SAGE Handbook of Resistance, pp. 224–43. London: Sage.

Austin, J., M. Charenko, M. Dillon, and J. Lincoln. 2020. “Systemic Oppression and the Contested Ground of Information Access for Incarcerated People.” Open Information Science 4, no. 1: 169–85.

Conrad, S. 2017. Prison Librarianship: Policy and Practice. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.

Gaines, L. V. 2019. “Lawmakers to Question Officials about Removing Hundreds of Books from Prison Library.” NPR Illinois. https://news.stlpublicradio.org/2019-06-26/lawmakers-to-question-officials-about-removing-hundreds-of-books-from-a-prison-library.

Jordan-Makely, C., and J. Austin. 2021. “Outside and In: Services for People Impacted by Incarceration.” Library Journal 146, no. 9: 21–25.

Jordan-Makely, C., J. Austin, and C. Brammer. 2022. “Growing Services: How Libraries Outside of Prison Create Access for Incarcerated People.” Library Journal 147, no. 8: 24–29.

PEN America. 2019. “Literature Locked Up: How Prison Book Restriction Policies Constitute the Nation’s Largest Book Ban. https://pen.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/literature-locked-up-report-9.24.19.pdf.

Pokornowski, S., K. Tanaka, and D. Epps. 2023. “Security and Censorship: A Comparative Analysis of State Department of Corrections Media Review Rolicies.” Ithaka S+R, April 20. https://sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/SR-Report-Security-and-Censorship-DOC-Media-Review-Policies-04202023.pdf.

Polo, M. J. 2022. “ACLU to Michigan Prisons: Banning Non-English Language Books is Discriminatory.” NPR/Michigan Radio, September 22. https://www.michiganradio.org/criminal-justice-legal-system/2022-09-22/aclu-to-michigan-prisons-banning-non-english-language-books-is-discriminatory.

San Francisco Public Library. 2023. “Expanding Information Access for Incarcerated People.” https://sfpl.org/services/jail-and-reentry-services/.expanding-information-access-incarcerated-people-initiative.

Sweeney, M. 2010. Reading is My Window: Books and the Art of Reading in Women’s Prisons. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

The Marshall Project. 2023. “What Books are Banned in Your State’s Prisons.” https://www.themarshallproject.org/2022/12/21/prison-banned-books-list-find-your-state.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/jifp.v8i2.8036

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




ALA Privacy Policy

© 2023 OIF