Emphasizing the Economic: Nancy Fraser, the Cultural-Redistributive Divide, and Social Justice’s PR Crisis

Michael Kirby

Abstract


The philosopher Nancy Fraser defines two paradigms for social justice: the economic and the cultural. These two paradigms often find themselves at odds (the familiar struggle between class politics and identity politics), but only when working in conjunction, according to Fraser, can they reach their emancipatory potential. Contra Fraser, this paper argues that there exist some historical moments in which it is necessary for one paradigm to take precedence over the other. In our current political moment, both the Right and the Left can be said to be fixated on culture, and this fixation ultimately disadvantages the Left: it appears as if the Right has already won the culture war, at least within the minds of a statistically significant portion of the American populace. Legal attempts to protect social justice seem similarly doomed. In order to persuade the public of the advantages of the movement, this paper argues that we must begin to emphasize its universal economic benefits.

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


American Library Association. 2017. “Notable First Amendment Court Cases.” https://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/censorship/courtcases.

American Library Association. 2021. “The Merritt Fund.” https://www.ala.org/aboutala/affiliates/relatedgroups/merrittfund/merritthumanitarian.

Ansell, Amy. 1997. New Right, New Racism: Race and Reaction in the United States and Great Britain. New York: New York University Press.

Austin Public Library. n.d. “The Breaking Library Silos for Social Justice (BLS4SJ) Collective.” Accessed on August 31, 2022. https://breakinglibrarysilos.weebly.com/.

Brown, Trevor, and Suzanne Mettler. 2022. “The Growing Rural-Urban Political Divide and Democratic Vulnerability.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 699, no. 1: 130–42.

Bolton, Alexander. 2022. “Cruz Presses Jackson on Critical Race Theory in Tense Questioning.” The Hill, March 22, 2022. https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/599275-cruz-presses-jackson-on-critical-race-theory-in-tense-questioning/.

Canceran, Delfo. 2020. “Saint Paul: A Revolutionary Subject.” Kritike 14, no. 2: 97–109.

Dodd, John L. 1985. “People v. Ruggles: The Ruggles, Robbins, Ross Roundabout.” Washington University School of Law Review 13: 641.

Douglas-Gabriel, Danielle, Tony Romm, and Jeff Stein. 2022. “Republicans are Readying Lawsuits to Block Biden’s Student Debt Plan.” Washington Post, September 1, 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/us-policy/2022/09/01/republicans-sue-biden-student-debt/.

Fraser, Nancy. 1998. “Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, Participation.” WZB Discussion Paper 98-108, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung, Berlin. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/44061/1/269802959.pdf.

Gimenez, Martha E. 2006. “With a Little Class: A Critique of Identity Politics.” Ethnicities 6, no. 3: 423–39.

Goldberg, Michelle. 2021. “A Frenzy of Book Banning.” New York Times, November 16.. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/12/opinion/book-bans.html.

Greenwald, Glenn. 2020. “Is the Traditional ACLU View of Free Speech Still Viable? Ira Glasser Speaks Out.” The Intercept, October 20, 2020. https://theintercept.com/2020/10/20/is-the-traditional-aclu-view-of-free-speech-still-viable-ira-glasser-speaks-out/.

Jones, Jeffrey. 2022. “U.S. Political Party Preferences Shifted Greatly During 2021.” Gallup, January 17. https://news.gallup.com/poll/388781/political-party-preferences-shifted-greatly-during-2021.aspx.

Lukes, Steven. 1982. “Can the Base be Distinguished from the Superstructure.” Analyse & Kritik 4, no. 2: 211–22.

Monmouth University Polling Institute. 2021. “National: Biden’s Plans More Popular Than President: Message May Matter More Than Substance in the End.” https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/documents/monmouthpoll_us_101021.pdf/.

Natanson, Hannah. 2022. “Virginia Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Challenging Sale of Two ‘Obscene’ Books.” Washington Post, August 31, 2022. https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/2022/08/30/barnes-and-noble-virginia-book-ban/.

Savage, Luke. 2021. “Joe Biden is Giving Us the Presidency the Left Always Predicted.” Jacobin, November 4, 2021. https://jacobin.com/2021/11/joe-biden-democratic-party-elections-presidency-the-left-predicted.

Schrecker, Ellen. 2006. “McCarthyism and the Red Scare.” In A Companion to Post-1945 America, edited by Jean-Christophe Agnew and Roy Rosenzweig, 372–82. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

Schuessler, Jennifer. 2021. “Bans on Critical Race Theory Threaten Free Speech, Advocacy Group Says.” New York Times, November 8, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/08/arts/critical-race-theory-bans.html.

The White House. 2022. “FACT SHEET: President Biden Announces Student Loan Relief for Borrowers Who Need It Most.” https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/statements-releases/2022/08/24/fact-sheet-president-biden-announces-student-loan-relief-for-borrowers-who-need-it-most/.

Walters, Suzanna Danuta. 2018. “In Defense of Identity Politics.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 43, no. 2: 235–45.

Williams, Raymond. 1973. “Base and Superstructure in Marxist Cultural Theory.” New Left Review 1, no. 82 (November/December). https://newleftreview.org/issues/i82/articles/raymond-williams-base-and-superstructure-in-marxist-cultural-theory.

Wilson, James Lindley. 2019. Unequal Voting: The US Senate and the Electoral College. Princeton: University of Princeton Press.

World Population Review. 2022. “States that Have Banned Critical Race Theory 2022.” https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/states-that-have-banned-critical-race-theory.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/jifp.v7i3.7860

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




ALA Privacy Policy

© 2024 OIF