Open Access
Subscription Access
What is Privacy Anyway? A Longitudinal Study of Media Frames of Privacy
Abstract
Technological development often prompts individuals to rethink the boundaries of their privacy. The decision of sharing or withholding information is also prompted by greater narratives that help readers to understand the shape of privacy and its relations to evolving societal landscapes. Informed by frame theory, the current study implements a longitudinal discourse analysis of 140 editorials published in US mainstream media outlets between 1900 and 2016 to explore how media narratives have framed privacy, and how they have rendered its connection with overarching societal contexts, across decades of technological development. Findings suggest that, in media narratives, the shape of privacy has shifted from a fundamental value to a more materialistic one. Also, across the decades, media frames have kept wavering between “the right to know” and “the right to privacy” – suggesting the importance of one over the other, mostly to respond to current political events.
References
Adkins Covert, Tawnya, and Philo C. Wasburn. 2007. “Measuring Media Bias: A Content Analysis of Time and Newsweek Coverage of Domestic Social Issues, 1975–2000.” Social Science Quarterly 88, no. 3: 690-706.
Allmer, Thomas. 2011. “A Critical Contribution to Theoretical Foundations of Privacy Studies.” Journal of Information, Communication & Ethics in Society 9, no. 2: 83–101.
Angwin, Julia, and Jennifer Valentino-DeVries. 2011. “Apple, Google Collect User Data.” Wall Street Journal, April 22.
Ariès, P., and G. Duby, eds. 1989. A History of Private Life I–V. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
boyd, dana. 2008. “Taken Out of Context: American Teen Sociality in Networked Publics.” PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.
Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2011. “Identifying Frames in Political News.” In Sourcebook for Political Communication Research: Methods, Measures, and Analytical Techniques, edited by Erik P. Bucy and R. Lance Holbert, 238–67. New York: Routledge.
Clark, Fiona, and Deborah H. Illman. 2003. “Content Analysis of New York Times Coverage of Space Issues for the Year 2000.” Science Communication 25, no. 1: 14–38.
Ellison, Nicole B., Charles Steinfield, and Cliff Lampe. 2008. “The Benefits of Facebook ‘Friends’ Social Capital and College Students’ Use of Online Social Network Sites.” Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12, no. 4: 1143–68.
Entman, Robert M. 1991. “Framing U.S. Coverage of International News: Contrasts in Narratives of the KAL and Iran Air Incidents.” Journal of Communication 41, no. 4: 6–27.
Fairclough, Norman. 2000. “Critical Analysis of Media Discourse.” In Media Studies, edited by P. Marris and S. Thornham, 308–25. New York: New York University Press.
Fornaciari, Federica. 2014. “Mapping the Territories of Privacy. Semantic Network Analysis of How American Mainstream Media Frame Privacy.” Paper presented at the 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Kona, Hawaii, January 6–9.
———. 2017. “Privacy Frames: How the Media Write About, Discuss, and Afford Privacy.” Paper presented at the International Association of Media and Communication Researchers, Cartagena, Colombia, July 16–20.
Fuchs, Charles. 2012. “The Political Economy of Privacy on Facebook.” Television New Media 13, no. 2: 139–59.
Gallagher, John, and Chris Bull. 1996. Perfect Enemies: The Religious Right, the Gay Movement, and the Politics of the 1990s. New York: Crown.
Gamson, William, and Andre Modigliani. 1989. “Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power.” American Journal of Sociology 95, no. 1: 1–37.
Garfinkel, Simson. 2000. Database Nation: The Death of Privacy in the 21st Century. New York: O’Reilly Media.
Goffman, Ervin. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay in the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Huhmann, Bruce A., and Timothy P. Brotherton. 1997. “A Content Analysis of Guilt Appeals in Popular Magazine Advertisements.” Journal of Advertising 26, no. 2: 35–45.
Jarvis, Jeff. 2011. Public Parts: How Sharing in the Digital Age Improves the Way We Work and Live. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Johnson, Deborah. 1994. Computer Ethics, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Nelkin, Dorothy. 1995. “Science’s Fall from Grace.” The Humanist 55, no. 5: 14–19.
Nippert-Eng, Christena. 2010. Islands of Privacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Nissenbaum, Helen. 2010. Privacy in Context. Technology, Policy, and the Integrity of Social Life. Stanford, CA: Stanford Law Books.
Powers, Angela, and Frederick Fico. 1994. “Influences on Use of Sources at Large U.S. Newspapers.” Newspaper Research Journal 15, no. 4: 87–94.
Shapiro, Stuart. 1998. “Places and Spaces: The Historical Interaction of Technology, Home, and Privacy.” Information Society 14, no. 4: 275–84.
Solove, Daniel J. 2001. “Privacy and Power: Computer Databases and Metaphors for Information Privacy.” Stanford Law Review 53, no. 6: 1393–462.
———. 2006. “A Taxonomy of Privacy.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 154, no. 3: 477–560.
Sterne, Jonathan. 2003. “Bourdieu, Technique and Technology.” Cultural Studies 17, no. 3/4: 367–89.
Tonkiss, Fran. 2004. “Analysing Discourse.” In Researching Society and Culture, edited by Clive Seale, 245–60. London: Sage.
Ventura, Holly, Mitchel Miller, and Matieu Deflem. 2005. “Governmentality and the War on Terror: FBI Project Carnivore and the Diffusion of Disciplinary Power.” Critical Criminology 13, no. 1: 55–70.
Wacks, Raymond. 1989. Personal Information: Privacy and the Law. Oxford: Clarendon.
Warren, Samuel, and Louis Brandeis. 1890. “The Right to Privacy.” Harvard Law Review 4, no. 5: 193–220.
Weiss, Carol H. 1974. “What America’s Leaders Read.” Public Opinion Quarterly 38, no. 1: 1–22.
Westin, Alan F. 1967. Privacy and Freedom. New York: Atheneum.
Zimmer, Michael. 2015. “Privacy Law and Regulation.” In The International Encyclopedia of Digital Communication and Society, edited by Robin Mansell and Pen Hwa Ang. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/jifp.v3i1.6414
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
© 2023 OIF