Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Unpacking the Engineering Process: Resourcing Trade Books and Biographies

Julie Jackson, Michelle Forsythe, Danielle S. L. Medeiros, Joseph Parthemore, Alexis Rix

Abstract


Interest in engineering education is growing, and libraries are often the hub of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) learning activities in schools and communities. To enhance patrons’ experiences, many libraries have incorporated making, maker, and tinkering spaces that support STEM learning and engineering thinking. Making, maker, and tinkering spaces generally include opportunities for patrons to have hands-on experiences with a variety of materials, technology resources, and design challenges that encourage thinking like an engineer. This type of thinking is “goal-oriented thinking that addresses problems and decisions within given constraints by drawing on available resources, both material resources and human capital.” Thinking like an engineer, making, and tinkering are all part of engineering design-based learning.

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Christine Lippard, Monica Lamm, and Katie Riley, “Engineering Thinking in Prekindergarten Children: A Systematic Literature Review,” Journal of Engineering Education 106, no. 3 (2017): 455.

NGSS Lead States, Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States, (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2013), 437.

Norman Fortenberry, “What is Engineering’s Plan in STEM Certification? ASEE Responds,” National Science Teachers Association Blog, January 25, 2018, http://nstacommunities.org/blog/2018/01/25/what-is-engineerings-place-in-stem-certification-asee-responds/.

NGSS Lead States, Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States, 437.

National Academy of Engineering, Changing the Conversation: Messages for Improving Public Understanding of Engineering (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2008), 100.

P. Renee Hill-Cunningham, Michael Mott, and Anna-Blair Hunt, “Facilitating an Elementary Engineering Design Process Module,” School Science and Mathematics 118, no. 1-2 (2018): 55.

“EiE Content Area Connections,” Engineering is Elementary, www.eie.org/eie-curriculum/eie-content-area-connections#alarms.

Michelle Forsythe, Julie Jackson, and Leo Contreras, “Hiding in Plain Sight: How to Identify and Use Trade Books to Support the 5E Instructional Model,” Science and Children 56, no. 2 (In Press).

Carolyn Parker, Erica Smith, David McKinney, and Amanda Laurier, “The Application of the Engineering Design Proves to Curriculum Revision: A Collaborative Approach to STEM Curriculum Refinement in an Urban District,” School Science and Mathematics 116, no. 7 (2016): 400.

“The Engineering Design Process,” Engineering is Elementary, www.eie.org/engineering-adventures/engineering-design-process.

Donna Werderich, Pamela Farris, and Alice McGinty, “Methods and Strategies: Biography as Mentor,” Science and Children 52, no. 2 (2014): 66.

“The Design Process,” Design Squad Nation, http://pbs.panda-prod.cdn.s3.amazonaws.com/media/assets/wgbh/adptech12/adptech12_int_idsprocess/index.html.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/cal.16.4.4

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© 2019 ALSC

ALA Privacy Policy