How Do Our Students Learn? An Outline of a Cognitive Psychological Model for Information Literacy Instruction
Abstract
References
Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Sarah Broadie and Christopher Rowe (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), I.2.
Terry Doyle and Todd Zakrajsek, The New Science of Learning: How to Learn in Harmony with Your Brain (Sterling, VA: Stylus Pub, 2013)
John Dunlosky et al., “Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14, no. 1 (January 1, 2013): 4–58
Harold Pashler et al., Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning (Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, 2007).
Richard E. Mayer and Merlin C. Wittrock, “Problem Solving,” in Handbook of Educational Psychology, Second (New York: Routledge, 2006), 289.
Cf. Bransford et al., who write that “the ultimate goal of learning is to have access to information for a wide set of purposes . . . [so students can] transfer what they have learned in school to everyday settings of home, community, and workplace” (1999, 73).
Dani Brecher and Kevin M. Klipfel, “Education Training for Instruction Librarians: A Shared Perspective,” Communications in Information Literacy 8, no. 1 (2014): 43–49.
Alison J. Head, Learning Curve: How College Graduates Solve Information Problems Once They Join the Workplace, Project Information Literacy Research Report, 2012.
See e.g., Angela Weiler, “Information-Seeking Behavior in Generation Y Students: Motivation, Critical Thinking, and Learning Theory,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 31, no. 1 (January 2005): 46–53.
Myron H. Dembo and Keith Howard, “Advice about the Use of Learning Styles: A Major Myth in Education,” Journal of College Reading and Learning 37, no. 2 (Spr 2007): 101–9.
Harold Pashler et al., “Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9, no. 3 (December 2009): 105–19
Frank Coffield et al., Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review (London: Learning & Skills Research Centre, 2004).
Daniel T. Willingham, Why Don’t Students like School? A Cognitive Scientist Answers Questions about How the Mind Works and What It Means for the Classroom, 1st ed. (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009), 147.
Daniel Willingham and David Daniel, “Teaching to What Students Have in Common,” Educational Leadership 69, no. 5 (February 2012): 21.
Cedar Riener and Daniel T. Willingham, “The Myth of Learning Styles,” Change (October 2010).
Harry F. Harlow, Margaret Kuenne Harlow, and Donald R. Meyer, “Learning Motivated by a Manipulation Drive,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 40, no. 2 (April 1950): 228–34.
Daniel H. Pink, Drive: The Surprising Truth about What Motivates Us (New York: Riverhead Books, 2009).
Paul J. Silvia, “Interest—The Curious Emotion,” Current Directions in Psychological Science 17, no. 1 (February 2008): 57–60.
David Kember, Amber Ho, and Celina Hong, “The Importance of Establishing Relevance in Motivating Student Learning,” Active Learning in Higher Education 9, no. 3 (November 1, 2008): 249–63.
Karen Murphy and Patricia A. Alexander, Understanding How Students Learn: A Guide for Instructional Leaders, Leadership for Learning (Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, 2006), 41.
Amy Van Epps and Megan Sapp Nelson, “One-Shot or Embedded? Assessing Different Delivery Timing for Information Resources Relevant to Assignments,” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 8, no. 1 (n.d.).
George A. Miller, “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information,” Psychological Review 63 (1956): 81–97.
Alan Baddeley, “The Magical Number Seven: Still Magic After All These Years?,” Psychological Review 101, no. 2 (April 1994): 353–56.
Nelson Cowan, “The Magical Number 4 in Short-Term Memory: A Reconsideration of Mental Storage Capacity,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, no. 1 (February 2001): 87–114.
Fernand Gobet and Gary Clarkson, “Chunks in Expert Memory: Evidence for the Magical Number Four . . . or Is It Two?,” Memory 12, no. 6 (November 2004): 732–47.
John Sweller, “Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning,” Cognitive Science 12, no. 2 (1988): 257–85.
Paul Chandler and John Sweller, “Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction,” Cognition and Instruction 8, no. 4 (1991): 293–332.
David Bawden and Lyn Robinson, “The Dark Side of Information: Overload, Anxiety and Other Paradoxes and Pathologies,” Journal of Information Science 35, no. 2 (April 2009): 180–91.
Joel Rudd and Mary Jo Rudd, “Coping with Information Load: User Strategies and Implications for Librarians,” College & Research Libraries 47, no. 4 (July 1986): 315–22.
Willingham, Why Don’t Students like School?, 14.
Brian Boyd, On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Belknap, 2010).
Jonathan Gottschall, The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2012).
Joan Didion, “The White Album,” in The White Album: Essays (New York: Farrar, 1979), 11–50.
Stephen N. Elliott, Thomas R. Kratochwill, and Joan Littlefield Cook, Educational Psychology: Effective Teaching, Effective Learning, 3rd ed. (Boston: McGraw Hill, 2000).
See also Daniel Willingham, “Making Students More CURIOUS,” Knowledge Quest 42, no. 5 (May 2014): 32. In addition to increasing information retention, this methodology, by demonstrating the instructor’s curiosity with research, can facilitate students’ curiosity and cognitive engagement.
Jody Rosen, “Rosen on Drake’s Nothing Was the Same: Is Drake the Rap-Game Taylor Swift?,” Vulture, September 24, 2013, www.vulture.com/2013/09/music-review-drake-nothing-was-the-same.html.
Yvonne Nalani Meulemans and Allison Carr, “Not at Your Service: Building Genuine Faculty-Librarian Partnerships,” Reference Services Review 41, no. 1 (2013): 80–90.
Katy Waldman, “Haters Gonna Hate, Study Confirms,” The XX, August 28, 2013, www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/08/28/haters_are_gonna_hate_dispositional_attitude_study_confirms_it.html.
Diana J Arya and Andrew Maul, “The Role of the Scientific Discovery Narrative in Middle School Science Education: An Experimental Study,” Journal of Educational Psychology 104, no. 4 (November 2012): 1022–32.
“Polo Shirt,” Wikipedia, August 16, 2014, http://en.wikipedia
.org/wiki/Polo_shirt.
Don Fallis, “On Verifying the Accuracy of Information: Philosophical Perspectives,” Library Trends 52, no. 3 (2004): 463–87.
The CRAAP test has students evaluate information by its currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose: www.csuchico.edu/
lins/handouts/eval_websites.pdf.
Barak Rosenshine, Carla Meister, and Saul Chapman, “Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of the Intervention Studies,” Review of Educational Research 66, no. 2 (January 1, 1996): 181–221.
Scotty D. Craig et al., “The Deep-Level-Reasoning-Question Effect: The Role of Dialogue and Deep-Level-Reasoning Questions during Vicarious Learning,” Cognition & Instruction 24, no. 4 (2006): 565–91
Pashler et al., Organizing Instruction & Study to Improve Student Learning.
Henry L. Roediger and Andrew C. Butler, “The Critical Role of Retrieval Practice in Long-Term Retention,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15, no. 1 (2011): 20–27.
Angela L. Duckworth et al., “Deliberate Practice Spells Success: Why Grittier Competitors Triumph at the National Spelling Bee,” Social Psychological and Personality Science 2, no. 2 (March 1, 2011): 174–81.
K. Anders Ericsson, Ralf Th. Krampe, and Clemens Tesch-romer, “The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance,” Psychological Review 100, no. 3 (1993): 363–406.
Malcolm Gladwell, Outliers: The Story of Success, 1st ed (New York: Little, Brown, 2008).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.55n1.34
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
© 2023 RUSA