For Your Enrichment: A Model for Developing and Implementing a Systematic Review Service for Disciplines outside of the Health Sciences

Amy Riegelman, Megan Kocher


Support for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the social sciences is an innovative service that makes advanced use of the expert skills of reference librarians and subject specialists. This column provides a deep look into the launch of one systematic review service to provide a model that is adaptable for other academic and special libraries.—Editor

Full Text:



Maria J. Grant and Andrew Booth, “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies,” Health Information and Libraries Journal 26, no. 2 (2009): 91–108,

Jonathan B. Koffel, “Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews and the Impact of Librarian Involvement: A Cross-Sectional Survey of Recent Authors,” PLOS ONE 10, no. 5 (2015),

Genevieve C. Gore and Julie Jones, “Systematic Reviews and Librarians: A Primer for Managers,” Partnership: The Canadian Journal of Library and Information Practice and Research 10, no.1 (2015),

Carol Lefebvre, Eric Manheimer, and Julie Glanville, “Searching for Studies,” in Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions, edited by Julian P. Higgins and Sally Green (Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2008): 95–150,

“Producing a Review,” The Campbell Collaboration, accessed February 28, 2018,

Jonathan B. Koffel and Melissa L. Rethlefsen, “Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews Published in High-Impact Pediatrics, Cardiology and Surgery Journals: A Cross-Sectional Study,” PLOS ONE 11, no. 9 (2016),

Robin MN Parker and Maggie J. Neilson, “Lost in Translation: Supporting Learners to Search Comprehensively across Databases,” Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association/Journal de l’Association des bibliothèques de la santé du Canada 36, no. 2 (2015): 54–58.

Misa Mi, “Leveraging Research Synthesis for Promoting and Expanding Library Services and Educational Programs,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 42, no. 2 (2016): 151–53.

Emilie Ludeman et al., “Developing a Library Systematic Review Service: A Case Study,” Medical Reference Services Quarterly 34, no. 2 (2015): 173–80.

Margaret J. Foster and Sarah T. Jewell, eds., Assembling the Pieces of a Systematic Review: A Guide for Librarians, Medical Library Association Books (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2017).

Koffel, “Use of Recommended Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews”; Koffel and Rethlefsen, “Reproducibility of Search Strategies Is Poor in Systematic Reviews.”

“Editorial Policies,” The New England Journal of Medicine,



  • There are currently no refbacks.

ALA Privacy Policy

© 2023 RUSA