Information Literacy and Instruction: Scaling Instruction to Needs: Updating an Online Information Literacy Course

Sarah LeMire

Abstract


Scalability is a buzzword in both libraries and higher education these days. As library budgets continue to tighten and technology continues to advance, libraries are flipping classrooms and deploying technology in order to better scale our instructional efforts. The University of Utah is no different. Several years ago, the library moved away from the standard one-shot workshops offered to the University’s undergraduate writing requirement course, Writing 2010, and replaced it with an online information literacy course. The transition has largely been successful, both at reducing the number of low-impact one-shot workshops our librarians teach, and also at involving instructors in information literacy. However, changes in personnel, technology, and curriculum prompted a recent revision and updating of the library’s information literacy course.


Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Penny M. Beile and David N. Boote, “Does the Medium Matter?: A Comparison of a Web-Based Tutorial with Face-to-Face Library Instruction on Education Students’ Self-Efficacy Levels and Learning Outcomes,” Research Strategies 20, no. 1–2 (2004): 57–68.

Susan L. Silver and Lisa T. Nickel, “Are Online Tutorials Effective? A Comparison of Online and Classroom Library Instruction Methods,” Research Strategies 20, no. 4 (2005): 389–96; Carol Anne Germain, Trudi E. Jacobson, and Sue A. Kaczor, “A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Presentation Formats for Instruction: Teaching First-Year Students,” College & Research Libraries 61, no. 1 (January 2000): 65–72, http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.61.1.65; James Nichols, Barbara Shaffer, and Karen Shockey, “Changing the Face of Instruction: Is Online or In-Class More Effective?,” College & Research Libraries 64, no. 5 (September 2003): 378–88, http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl.64.5.378.

Kelly A. Donaldson, “Library Research Success: Designing an Online Tutorial to Teach Information Literacy Skills to First-Year Students,” The Internet and Higher Education 2, no. 4 (Winter 2000): 237–51; Paul J. Bracke and Ruth Dickstein, “Web Tutorials and Scalable Instruction: Testing the Waters,” Reference Services Review 30, no. 4 (2002): 330–37, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/00907320210451321; Nicole Johnston, “Is an Online Learning Module an Effective Way to Develop Information Literacy Skills?,” Australian Academic & Research Libraries 41, no. 3 (2010): 207–18, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00048623.2010.10721464.

Sara Arnold-Garza, “The Flipped Classroom Teaching Model and Its Use for Information Literacy Instruction,” Communications in Information Literacy 8, no. 1 (2014): 7–22, accessed July 8, 2016, http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1089137.pdf; Ilka Datig and Claire Ruswick, “Four Quick Flips,” College & Research Libraries News 74, no. 5 (2013): 249–57, accessed July 8, 2016, http://crln.acrl.org/content/74/5/249.full.

Jessica Long, John J. Burke, and Beth Tumbleson, “Research to Go: Taking an Information Literacy Credit Course Online,” Journal of Library & Information Services in Distance Learning 6, no. 3/4 (2012): 387–97; Yvonne Mery, Jill Newby, and Ke Peng, “Why One-Shot Information Literacy Sessions Are Not the Future of Instruction: A Case for Online Credit Courses,” College & Research Libraries 73, no. 4 (2012): 366–77, http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/crl-271.

Nancy Dewald et al., “Information Literacy at a Distance: Instructional Design Issues,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 26, no. 1 (January 2000): 33–44; Gwendolyn J. Reece, “Critical Thinking and Cognitive Transfer: Implications for the Development of Online Information Literacy Tutorials,” Research Strategies 20, no. 4 (2005): 482–93; Paul L. Hrycaj, “Elements of Active Learning in the Online Tutorials of ARL Members,” Reference Services Review 33, no. 2 (2005): 210–18.

Travis Willmann, “Teach-the-Teacher Approach Wins Award,” Tex Libris (blog), University of Texas Libraries, June 2, 2010, http://blogs.lib.utexas.edu/texlibris/2010/06/02/teach-the-teacher-approach-wins-award.

L. Dee Fink, Creating Significant Learning Experiences: An Integrated Approach to Designing College Courses (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2013); “Phase 1 – Design,” Quality Course Framework Tutorial, accessed November 7, 2014, https://utah.instructure.com/courses/33024/pages/phase-1-design.

Pamela Alexondra Jackson, “Integrating Information Literacy into Blackboard: Building Campus Partnerships for Successful Student Learning,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 33, no. 4 (July 2007): 454–61.

Lori S. Mestre, “Matching up Learning Styles with Learning Objects: What’s Effective?,” Journal of Library Administration 50, no. 7/8 (2010): 808–29.

Melissa Bowles-Terry, Merinda Kaye Hensley, and Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe, “Best Practices for Online Video Tutorials in Academic Libraries: A Study of Student Preferences and Understanding,” Communications in Information Literacy 4, no. 1 (2010), 17–28, accessed July 8, 2016, http://eduscapes.com/instruction/articles/bowles.pdf.

Nicole Pagowsky, “Keeping Up With . . . Digital Badges for Instruction,” Keeping Up With . . . (blog), Association of College & Research Libraries, September 2013, www.ala.org/acrl/publications/keeping_up_with/digital_badges.

“Badges,” University of Central Florida infolit Information Literacy, accessed November 7, 2014, http://infolit.ucf.edu/faculty/badges; Nicole Pagowsky, “Test-Driving Purdue’s Passport Gamification Platform for Library Instruction,” ACRL TechConnect (blog), Association of College & Research Libraries, January 28, 2013, http://acrl.ala.org/techconnect/?p=2676.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.56n1.17

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ALA Privacy Policy

© 2021 RUSA