Accidental Technologist: How Can Libraries Improve Wikipedia?

Eric Phetteplace

Abstract


Wikipedia and libraries got off to a strained start. Perhaps this is only my perception, but it appeared that Wikipedia was used as a defenseless punching bag in much information literacy instruction. The refrain was always “don’t use Wikipedia” or “don’t use Google” to the neglect of far worse research sources like Yahoo! Answers. This “traditional” stance of librarianship was that the community-edited encyclopedia failed any quality analysis due to its sketchy authority; “anyone can edit”—anonymously even!—and therefore its content cannot possibly be trusted. Instructors would even develop assignments wherein students would vandalize the encyclopedia, deliberately inserting inaccurate or incoherent content, to demonstrate its unreliability. Leaving ethics aside, such assignments are constructed to ignore the finely tuned “bots” (editing programs which constantly crawl the site looking for clear signs of mischief) and diligent editors working to remove such content.

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


“Wikipedia: Researching with Wikipedia,” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, 2014, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Researching_with_Wikipedia&oldid=629003624.

Jim Giles, “Internet Encyclopaedias Go Head to Head” Nature 438, no. 7070 (2005): 900–901, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/438900a.

“Wikipedia: External Peer Review/Nature December 2005,” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, 2012, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:External_peer_review/Nature_December_2005&oldid=524721916.

Jona Kräenbring et al., “Accuracy and Completeness of Drug Information in Wikipedia: A Comparison with Standard Textbooks of Pharmacology,” PLoS ONE 9, no. 9 (2005): e106930, http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106930.

Ann M. Lally and Carolyn E. Dunford, “Using Wikipedia to Extend Digital Collections,” D-Lib Magazine 13, no. 5/6 (2007), http://dx.doi.org/10.1045/may2007-lally.

Lauren Pressley and Carolyn J. McCallum, “Putting the Library in Wikipedia,” ONLINE Magazine (September 2008), https://wakespace.lib.wfu.edu/handle/10339/31874.

Danielle Elder, R. Niccole Westbrook, and Michele Reilly, “Wikipedia Lover, Not a Hater: Harnessing Wikipedia to Increase the Discoverability of Library Resources,” Journal of Web Librarianship 6, no. 1 (2012): 32–44, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19322909.2012.641808.

“Google Analytics Usage Reports for CARLI Digital Collections | CARLI,” Consortium of Academic and Research Libraries in Illinois, 2015, www.carli.illinois.edu/products-services/contentdm/google-analytics-usage-reports-carli-digital-collections.

Bess Sadler and Chris Bourg, “Feminism and the Future of Library Discovery,” The Code4Lib Journal 28 (April 2015), http://journal.code4lib.org/articles/10425.

Shyong (Tony) K. Lam et al., “WP:Clubhouse?: An Exploration of Wikipedia’s Gender Imbalance,” in Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration (New York: ACM, 2011), 1–10, http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2038558.2038560. http://files.grouplens.org/papers/wp-gender-wikisym2011.pdf.

Robert Clark Templeton, Race Riots, Detroit: Twelfth Street, Detroit, 1967, pastel on paper, National Portrait Gallery, http://collections.si.edu/search/results.htm?q=record_ID%3Anpg_NPG. 78.TC167&repo=DPLA.

“Wikipedia: Meetup/ArtAndFeminism,” Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia, 2015, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Meetup/ArtAndFeminism&oldid=676121837.

Joseph Reagle, “Good Faith Collaboration: The Culture of Wikipedia,” 2015, http://reagle.org/joseph/2010/gfc.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.55n2.109

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


© 2017 RUSA