First Year Course Programmatic Assessment: Final Essay Information Literacy Analysis

Holly Luetkenhaus, Steve Borrelli, Corey Johnson

Abstract


Washington State University recently launched a new general education system with a foundational first year course called Roots of Contemporary Issues. Roots features a set of library research assignments and a culminating final essay, jointly developed and maintained by Roots instructors and librarians. A group of Roots instructors and a WSU librarian conducted a study to assess the achievement of the information literacy, and critical and creative thinking student learning outcomes associated with the research project. The group found that students were proficient at the first year level in terms of utilizing scholarly materials and source attribution. The students were less successful concerning argument building and source analysis; they struggled most with thesis development. Adjustments to the assignments were made in light of these results and the findings contributed to the larger university-wide assessment program.

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


“Undergraduate Graduation Requirements: Seven Learning Goals and Outcomes,” accessed May 27, 2014, http://ugr.wsu

.edu/students/7Goals.html.

“Roots of Contemporary Issues Research Tutorials,” accessed May 27, 2014, http://libguides.wsulibs.wsu.edu/rci.

Amos Lakos and Shelley Phipp, “Creating a Culture of Assessment: A Catalyst for Organizational Change,” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 4 (July 2004): 345–61, http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.2004.0052.

Megan Oakleaf and Neal Kaske, “Guiding Questions for Assessing Information Literacy in Higher Education,” Portal: Libraries and the Academy 9 (April 2009): 273–86, http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/pla.0.0046.

Mary M. Sommerville et al., “Toward Large Scale Assessment of Information and Communication Technology Literacy,” Reference Services Review 35 (2007): 8–20.

Angela Bridgland and Martha Whitehead, “Information Literacy in the ‘E’ Environment: An Approach for Sustainability,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 31 (January 2005): 54–59.

Donna Ziegenfuss and Steve Borrelli, “Collaborative Qualitative Research: A Consortium Approach to Exploring the Complexity of Student Learning Outcome Practices Across Multiple Institutions” (paper presented at the Library Assessment Conference for the Association of Research Libraries, Seattle, Washington, August 4–6, 2014), accessed September 15, 2014, http://libraryassessment.org/bm~doc/22ziegenfusspaper.pdf.

Jennifer L. Dorner, Susan E. Taylor, and Kay Hodson-Carlton, “Faculty-librarian Collaboration for Nursing Information Literacy: A Tiered Approach,” Reference Services Review 29 (2001): 132–40.

Adrian Stagg and Lindy Kimmins, “Research Skills Development Through Collaborative Virtual Learning Environments,” Reference Services Review 40 (2012): 61–74.

Jackie Belanger, Rebecca Bliquez, and Sharleen Mondal, “Developing a Collaborative Faculty-Librarian Information Literacy Assessment Project,” Library Review 61 (March 2012): 68–91.

Shikha Sharma, “From Chaos to Clarity: Using the Research Portfolio to Teach and Assess Information Literacy Skills,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 33 (January 2007): 127–35.

Linda Blake and Tim Warner, “Seeing the Forest of Information for the Trees of Papers,” Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship 64 (2011): n.p., http://dx.doi.org/10.5062/F4W66HPP.

Kathleen Dunn, “Assessing Information Literacy Skills in the California State University: A Progress Report,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 28 (January–March 2002): 26–35.

Sommerville et al., Toward Large Scale Assessment of Information and Communication Technology Literacy.

Megan Oakleaf, “What’s the Value of an Academic Library? The Development of the ACRL Value of Academic Libraries Comprehensive Research Review and Report,” Australian Academic & Research Libraries 42 no. 1 (March 2011): 1–13.

Davida Scharf et al., “Direct Assessment of Information Literacy Using Writing Portfolios,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 33 (July 2007): 462–78.

“The Survey System,” accessed October 27, 2014 www.survey

system.com/sscalc.htm.

“Information Literacy VALUE Rubric,” accessed October 27, 2014, www.aacu.org/VALUE/rubrics/information-literacy.

BM SPSS Statistics 22 (for Windows) (Armonk, NY: IBM, 2013).

Scharf, “Direct Assessment of Information Literacy,” 469.

Corey M. Johnson et al., “Information Literacy Instruction and Assessment in an Honors College Science Fundamentals Course,” College & Research Libraries 72, no. 6 (2011): 533–47.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.55n1.49

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ALA Privacy Policy

© 2018 RUSA