How Do Our Students Learn? An Outline of a Cognitive Psychological Model for Information Literacy Instruction

Dani Brecher Cook, Kevin Michael Klipfel

Abstract


Effective pedagogy requires understanding how students learn and tailoring our instruction accordingly. One key element of student-centered pedagogy involves understanding the cognitive psychological processes according to which students learn, and to structure our teaching with these processes in mind. This paper fills in a gap in the current literature, by applying empirically grounded lessons drawn from the cognitive science of learning, and discussing specific applications of these lessons for information literacy instruction. The paper outlines a framework for information literacy instruction, grounded in the educational and cognitive psychology literature, for facilitating student retention and transfer of information literacy skills, two classic measures of student learning. Five specific principles and several strategies for promoting retention and transfer within information literacy instruction are outlined. This article is an expansion of a presentation given at LOEX in May 2014.

Full Text:

HTML PDF

References


Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, ed. Sarah Broadie and Christopher Rowe (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002), I.2.

Terry Doyle and Todd Zakrajsek, The New Science of Learning: How to Learn in Harmony with Your Brain (Sterling, VA: Stylus Pub, 2013)

John Dunlosky et al., “Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions From Cognitive and Educational Psychology,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 14, no. 1 (January 1, 2013): 4–58

Harold Pashler et al., Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning (Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, 2007).

Richard E. Mayer and Merlin C. Wittrock, “Problem Solving,” in Handbook of Educational Psychology, Second (New York: Routledge, 2006), 289.

Cf. Bransford et al., who write that “the ultimate goal of learning is to have access to information for a wide set of purposes . . . [so students can] transfer what they have learned in school to everyday settings of home, community, and workplace” (1999, 73).

Dani Brecher and Kevin M. Klipfel, “Education Training for Instruction Librarians: A Shared Perspective,” Communications in Information Literacy 8, no. 1 (2014): 43–49.

Alison J. Head, Learning Curve: How College Graduates Solve Information Problems Once They Join the Workplace, Project Information Literacy Research Report, 2012.

See e.g., Angela Weiler, “Information-Seeking Behavior in Generation Y Students: Motivation, Critical Thinking, and Learning Theory,” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 31, no. 1 (January 2005): 46–53.

Myron H. Dembo and Keith Howard, “Advice about the Use of Learning Styles: A Major Myth in Education,” Journal of College Reading and Learning 37, no. 2 (Spr 2007): 101–9.

Harold Pashler et al., “Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence,” Psychological Science in the Public Interest 9, no. 3 (December 2009): 105–19

Frank Coffield et al., Learning Styles and Pedagogy in Post-16 Learning: A Systematic and Critical Review (London: Learning & Skills Research Centre, 2004).

Daniel T. Willingham, Why Don’t Students like School? A Cognitive Scientist Answers Questions about How the Mind Works and What It Means for the Classroom, 1st ed. (San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009), 147.

Daniel Willingham and David Daniel, “Teaching to What Students Have in Common,” Educational Leadership 69, no. 5 (February 2012): 21.

Cedar Riener and Daniel T. Willingham, “The Myth of Learning Styles,” Change (October 2010).

Harry F. Harlow, Margaret Kuenne Harlow, and Donald R. Meyer, “Learning Motivated by a Manipulation Drive,” Journal of Experimental Psychology 40, no. 2 (April 1950): 228–34.

Daniel H. Pink, Drive: The Surprising Truth about What Motivates Us (New York: Riverhead Books, 2009).

Paul J. Silvia, “Interest—The Curious Emotion,” Current Directions in Psychological Science 17, no. 1 (February 2008): 57–60.

David Kember, Amber Ho, and Celina Hong, “The Importance of Establishing Relevance in Motivating Student Learning,” Active Learning in Higher Education 9, no. 3 (November 1, 2008): 249–63.

Karen Murphy and Patricia A. Alexander, Understanding How Students Learn: A Guide for Instructional Leaders, Leadership for Learning (Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin, 2006), 41.

Amy Van Epps and Megan Sapp Nelson, “One-Shot or Embedded? Assessing Different Delivery Timing for Information Resources Relevant to Assignments,” Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 8, no. 1 (n.d.).

George A. Miller, “The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information,” Psychological Review 63 (1956): 81–97.

Alan Baddeley, “The Magical Number Seven: Still Magic After All These Years?,” Psychological Review 101, no. 2 (April 1994): 353–56.

Nelson Cowan, “The Magical Number 4 in Short-Term Memory: A Reconsideration of Mental Storage Capacity,” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, no. 1 (February 2001): 87–114.

Fernand Gobet and Gary Clarkson, “Chunks in Expert Memory: Evidence for the Magical Number Four . . . or Is It Two?,” Memory 12, no. 6 (November 2004): 732–47.

John Sweller, “Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning,” Cognitive Science 12, no. 2 (1988): 257–85.

Paul Chandler and John Sweller, “Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of Instruction,” Cognition and Instruction 8, no. 4 (1991): 293–332.

David Bawden and Lyn Robinson, “The Dark Side of Information: Overload, Anxiety and Other Paradoxes and Pathologies,” Journal of Information Science 35, no. 2 (April 2009): 180–91.

Joel Rudd and Mary Jo Rudd, “Coping with Information Load: User Strategies and Implications for Librarians,” College & Research Libraries 47, no. 4 (July 1986): 315–22.

Willingham, Why Don’t Students like School?, 14.

Brian Boyd, On the Origin of Stories: Evolution, Cognition, and Fiction (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Belknap, 2010).

Jonathan Gottschall, The Storytelling Animal: How Stories Make Us Human (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, 2012).

Joan Didion, “The White Album,” in The White Album: Essays (New York: Farrar, 1979), 11–50.

Stephen N. Elliott, Thomas R. Kratochwill, and Joan Littlefield Cook, Educational Psychology: Effective Teaching, Effective Learning, 3rd ed. (Boston: McGraw Hill, 2000).

See also Daniel Willingham, “Making Students More CURIOUS,” Knowledge Quest 42, no. 5 (May 2014): 32. In addition to increasing information retention, this methodology, by demonstrating the instructor’s curiosity with research, can facilitate students’ curiosity and cognitive engagement.

Jody Rosen, “Rosen on Drake’s Nothing Was the Same: Is Drake the Rap-Game Taylor Swift?,” Vulture, September 24, 2013, www.vulture.com/2013/09/music-review-drake-nothing-was-the-same.html.

Yvonne Nalani Meulemans and Allison Carr, “Not at Your Service: Building Genuine Faculty-Librarian Partnerships,” Reference Services Review 41, no. 1 (2013): 80–90.

Katy Waldman, “Haters Gonna Hate, Study Confirms,” The XX, August 28, 2013, www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2013/08/28/haters_are_gonna_hate_dispositional_attitude_study_confirms_it.html.

Diana J Arya and Andrew Maul, “The Role of the Scientific Discovery Narrative in Middle School Science Education: An Experimental Study,” Journal of Educational Psychology 104, no. 4 (November 2012): 1022–32.

“Polo Shirt,” Wikipedia, August 16, 2014, http://en.wikipedia

.org/wiki/Polo_shirt.

Don Fallis, “On Verifying the Accuracy of Information: Philosophical Perspectives,” Library Trends 52, no. 3 (2004): 463–87.

The CRAAP test has students evaluate information by its currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose: www.csuchico.edu/

lins/handouts/eval_websites.pdf.

Barak Rosenshine, Carla Meister, and Saul Chapman, “Teaching Students to Generate Questions: A Review of the Intervention Studies,” Review of Educational Research 66, no. 2 (January 1, 1996): 181–221.

Scotty D. Craig et al., “The Deep-Level-Reasoning-Question Effect: The Role of Dialogue and Deep-Level-Reasoning Questions during Vicarious Learning,” Cognition & Instruction 24, no. 4 (2006): 565–91

Pashler et al., Organizing Instruction & Study to Improve Student Learning.

Henry L. Roediger and Andrew C. Butler, “The Critical Role of Retrieval Practice in Long-Term Retention,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15, no. 1 (2011): 20–27.

Angela L. Duckworth et al., “Deliberate Practice Spells Success: Why Grittier Competitors Triumph at the National Spelling Bee,” Social Psychological and Personality Science 2, no. 2 (March 1, 2011): 174–81.

K. Anders Ericsson, Ralf Th. Krampe, and Clemens Tesch-romer, “The Role of Deliberate Practice in the Acquisition of Expert Performance,” Psychological Review 100, no. 3 (1993): 363–406.

Malcolm Gladwell, Outliers: The Story of Success, 1st ed (New York: Little, Brown, 2008).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5860/rusq.55n1.34

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ALA Privacy Policy

© 2018 RUSA