Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparative Analysis of Evidence-based Selection, Professional Selection, and Selection by Approval Plan

Molly Strothmann, Karen Rupp-Serrano

Abstract


This study compares three different models for selecting e-books for a research library’s collection. From 2013 to 2018, the University of Oklahoma Libraries contracted with Elsevier for an evidence-based selection (EBS) agreement. The titles in that EBS package were compared to the approval plan parameters to determine which books would have been purchased on approval during those years if Elsevier had been included among the publishers profiled. Subject librarians also made hypothetical selections as though they were placing firm orders from this collection. The approval plan selections and librarians’ selections were compared to usage data to determine how closely each selection model matched patrons’ choices.

Keywords


academic libraries; EBS; collection development; collection analysis

Full Text:

HTML PDF


DOI: https://doi.org/10.5860/lrts.64n1.15

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


ALA Privacy Policy

© 2019 ALCTS